But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. The psychikos anthrōpos (ψυχικὸς ἄνθρωπος, "natural/soulish man")—unregenerate humanity operating on purely natural faculties—ou dechetai (οὐ δέχεται, "does not receive/welcome") Spirit-truth. This isn't mere ignorance but active rejection: mōria autō estin (μωρία αὐτῷ ἐστιν, "it is foolishness to him"). Fallen reason considers gospel absurd (1:18, 23).
The explanation intensifies: neither can he know them (ou dynatai gnōnai, οὐ δύναται γνῶναι)—absolute inability, not difficulty. Pneumatikōs anakrinetai (πνευματικῶς ἀνακρίνεται, "they are spiritually discerned") indicates requirement: regeneration by Spirit precedes comprehension. This demolishes Pelagian confidence in human moral/intellectual capacity to seek God apart from grace (Romans 3:10-11). Apologetics cannot argue unbelievers into faith; only Spirit-regeneration opens blind eyes (2 Corinthians 4:4-6). Yet preaching remains necessary means—Spirit works through gospel proclamation.
Historical Context
Greek philosophy prized human reason's autonomy. Socratic method assumed humans could discover truth through dialectic. Paul's anthropology is grimmer: sin has corrupted reason itself, making divine truth unacceptable. This echoes Genesis 3—fallen humanity suppresses God-knowledge (Romans 1:18-21). Jewish thought also recognized human limitation but emphasized Torah-obedience; Paul emphasizes radical need for Spirit-transformation. The "natural man" operates in Adam; only those "in Christ" by Spirit-union can comprehend spiritual realities.
Questions for Reflection
How does the natural person's inability to understand spiritual truth shape your evangelistic expectations and methods?
What spiritual truths did you once consider foolish before regeneration, and how does that inform your patience with unbelievers?
How can you avoid both arrogance ("I figured it out") and despair ("they'll never believe") when recognizing only Spirit-work produces faith?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. The psychikos anthrōpos (ψυχικὸς ἄνθρωπος, "natural/soulish man")—unregenerate humanity operating on purely natural faculties—ou dechetai (οὐ δέχεται, "does not receive/welcome") Spirit-truth. This isn't mere ignorance but active rejection: mōria autō estin (μωρία αὐτῷ ἐστιν, "it is foolishness to him"). Fallen reason considers gospel absurd (1:18, 23).
The explanation intensifies: neither can he know them (ou dynatai gnōnai, οὐ δύναται γνῶναι)—absolute inability, not difficulty. Pneumatikōs anakrinetai (πνευματικῶς ἀνακρίνεται, "they are spiritually discerned") indicates requirement: regeneration by Spirit precedes comprehension. This demolishes Pelagian confidence in human moral/intellectual capacity to seek God apart from grace (Romans 3:10-11). Apologetics cannot argue unbelievers into faith; only Spirit-regeneration opens blind eyes (2 Corinthians 4:4-6). Yet preaching remains necessary means—Spirit works through gospel proclamation.